Tags
books, happy endings, Jane Austen, literature, Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner, Mr. Darcy, Mrs. Bennet, Pride and Prejudice, Pride and Prejudice 200th anniversary, proposals, weddings
Tenth (and last) in a series on rereading Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Here are Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine.
“Happy for all her maternal feelings was the day on which Mrs. Bennet got rid of her two most deserving daughters.” The opening line of the last chapter of Pride and Prejudice is my favourite line in the novel, as I mentioned when I first started writing this series of posts, because it’s the only mention of the wedding day for Elizabeth and Darcy, and Jane and Bingley. I like it because the focus on Mrs. Bennet’s attitude toward weddings ties the ending of the novel to the beginning, because the sentence is short and snappy, and because this line challenges the expectations of readers who come to the novel expecting a big wedding as the culmination of the courtship plot. There’s no question that Pride and Prejudice has a happy ending — but the wedding day isn’t the most important part of the happy ending.
I’ve made this point about the “Happy for all her maternal feelings” sentence before, but it’s hidden in an endnote about film adaptations in my book Jane Austen’s Philosophy of the Virtues (page 178, note 8). It’s an important point, though, so I’d like to highlight it here: “One-line weddings do not translate well to the screen.” Adaptations of Austen’s novels that focus on the wedding at the end don’t do justice to her emphasis on the process by which hero and heroine come to understand each other. Love is the most important thing for Elizabeth and Darcy; the wedding is the most important thing for Mrs. Bennet.
The happy ending isn’t just the final chapter of the novel, in which the narrator tells us what happened to everyone after the double wedding, it’s the three chapters that precede that one, in which the dialogue between characters is the main focus. Elizabeth thanks Darcy for what he did for Lydia, he assures her that his “affections and wishes are unchanged,” she accepts and returns his love, and they discuss the many misunderstandings of the past; Elizabeth tells Jane of her engagement and tries to persuade her sister that she really does love Darcy, and then she tries to persuade her father of the same thing; and in the second-last chapter, Elizabeth teases Darcy and tries to find out how he fell in love with her. Their happiness is shown in the spirited conversations they have about their affection, which contrast with, but are closely related to, the fiery disagreements they’ve had in the past. As Elizabeth assures her aunt, “I am happier even than Jane; she only smiles, I laugh.”
Jane Austen’s happy ending in Pride and Prejudice is much like her intriguing first chapter: she relies on dialogue more than description to make her plot and characters interesting.
The last sentence of the novel, like the first, is narration rather than dialogue, however, and this last line is nowhere near as famous as the first one. “Darcy, as well as Elizabeth, really loved them [the Gardiners]; and they were both ever sensible of the warmest gratitude towards the persons who, by bringing her into Derbyshire, had been the means of uniting them.” The Bennets always get more attention than the Gardiners in discussions of Pride and Prejudice, yet this last sentence reminds us that while Mrs. Bennet has tried so hard to secure single men of large fortune for her daughters, it is in fact Elizabeth’s aunt and uncle who have been instrumental in helping bring about her marriage, not only by taking her to Derbyshire, but by showing Darcy that she has family members she can be proud of.
Back to Darcy’s second proposal. I’ve said Austen’s use of dialogue is really important and effective in this happy ending. But why doesn’t she tell us exactly what they say when he proposes the second time? Darcy tells Elizabeth that his “affections and wishes are unchanged,” and this is how Austen describes her response: she “immediately, though not very fluently, gave him to understand, that her sentiments had undergone so material a change, since the period to which he alluded, as to make her receive with gratitude and pleasure, his present assurances.” Why don’t we get to hear what she says? Are you disappointed that we don’t hear it?
My page Pride and Prejudice at 200 collects all the posts in this series on rereading the novel, along with links to other essays and articles on P&P.
Thanks for celebrating the 200th anniversary of Pride and Prejudice with me! 2013 is an exciting year in the world of Jane Austen and Edith Wharton, my two favourite novelists, and I’m looking forward to beginning a new series of posts to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Wharton’s The Custom of the Country.
Please join me, starting July 4th, for conversations about the novel Wharton called her “magnum opus,” and about her controversial heroine Undine Spragg. Be sure to follow my blog or subscribe by email to make sure you don’t miss the discussion. In the meantime, if you haven’t already seen it, you might want to read Sage Mehta’s fascinating article in Salon on Undine Spragg, “Edith Wharton Invented Kim Kardashian.”
I’ve *always* wondered why Jane didn’t share this with us? She is such a master of dialogue that I know it would have been brilliant. Did she not want to be overdramatic? Could she possibly feel that she didn’t have the right words? I don’t understand. Yes, this is one of my few disappointments with the book. Austen does the same thing in Sense and Sensibility with Edward and Elinor. Instead of giving us the proposal scene she writes, “in what manner he expressed himself, and how he was received, need not be particularly told … he had secured his lady.” With each reread, I keep hoping that in fact I will get that scene. Sigh.
I really enjoyed this post and your thoughts on the Gardiners. Well done.
Sarah @WordHits
LikeLike
Thanks very much, Sarah. It’s hard to imagine Jane Austen not having the right words. I do think it could be that she’s more interested in showing us the dramatic moments of disagreement between Elizabeth and Darcy than in giving details about the happy moments of accepting a proposal, or about the wedding day. When Elizabeth says yes, she’s just like any other happy woman accepting a proposal—like Emma responding to Mr. Knightley’s proposal by saying “Just what she ought, of course. A lady always does.” Austen seems far more interested in the moments at which Elizabeth says things that make her unique, such as when she says no to Mr. Collins’s proposal: “ You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the last woman in the world who would make you so.”
Is it that happy women saying “yes,” and happy couples celebrating happy marriages, are all more or less alike? It’s the arguments, the disagreements, the tensions between Elizabeth and Darcy, that are more dramatically interesting. Still, it’s true, many readers have wished to hear more, not just in this proposal scene but in the other Austen novels as well. What was she thinking?
I like what you say about hoping that in some future rereading of Sense and Sensibility, the scene will be different! It reminds me of what Howard Jacobson says in the talk he gave at the Hay Festival on Sunday: “Thus we live on the edge of our nerves every time we read these novels, dreading that Darcy won’t overcome his pride or Captain Wentworth his bruised feelings, no matter that we know, because we’ve read the books a hundred times, that they will.” (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/10077004/Hay-Festival-2013-Howard-Jacobson-on-the-wonders-of-Austen.html)
LikeLike
Sarah,
You make a great point about Austen focusing on the tension not the happy moment. Still, I wish she would have given us a bit of that. I would love to have read her vision of the exchange/dialogue. I’m sure it would have been engaging … but not cutesy romantic or twee. How ironic that Austen is known for romance and happy endings when she was more focused on the tension.
Thx for the link to the Jacobson article. Enjoyed that. I confess I am a hopelessly optimistic rereader. Every time I revisit King Lear, I hope against hope that Edgar rescues Cordelia. Or that Lily Bart and Selden end up together in House of MIrth. Haha. Still, I must take after Austen b/c I don’t like “romance” novels and find myself rereading these books that do not have happy endings a la Wharton. 😉
Sarah
p.s. I may just join you in rereading The Custom of the Country. Undine Spragg!
LikeLike
Glad you liked the Jacobson article! Please do join me in rereading The Custom of the Country. Undine Spragg is so impossible, and endlessly fascinating.
LikeLike
Pingback: What about the contentment gene? | Austen's Guide to Happiness
I guess I’m the kind of EM Forster-like Janeite who reads with “the mind closed”, in that “criticism slumbers”. No, I’m not disappointed by the lack of dialogue in the P&P proposal scene, despite the fact that I love the Jane Eyre proposal scene for its dialogue. (Inconsistent female. 😉 In Austen’s writings, I tend to find the deep, but controlled feelings very touching and romantic (especially in Mr Knightley, but to a lesser extent in Mr Darcy). Perhaps it’s a product of Austen’s exquisite blend of sense and sensibility that she always avoided detailed proposals — she was too sensible to write love scenes that might be laughable in their lofty declarations, yet had a sufficiently high view of the importance of these feelings not to turn them into entertainment. Still, I enjoy the irony of Emma saying “just what she ought” when all throughout the novel she’s been offending (especially egregiously in the case of Miss Bates) by speaking imprudently.
Thanks for writing an enjoyable and thought-provoking series!
LikeLike
Interesting! Thanks for sharing your response to the proposal scenes. I like the irony you point out in Emma, and I’m intrigued by your idea that there’s no need for the most intimate moments to be made into entertainment.
LikeLike
Pingback: Five Years! | Sarah Emsley