Tags
Ann Kronheimer, books, children's books, Fiction, Gill Tavner, Jane Austen, Jane Austen for Kids, literature, Mansfield Park, Mansfield Park 200th anniversary, Real Reads, young adult books, young readers
My friend Rose is thirteen and she loves to read, so I asked for her opinion of the Real Reads adaptation of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. I’ve written about the Real Reads adaptations of Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice, but this time around I wanted to hear from someone in the target audience for these abridged versions of Austen’s novels – someone who hasn’t yet read Mansfield Park itself. The Real Reads Austen books are retold by Gill Tavner and illustrated by Ann Kronheimer.
I’m very happy to share Rose’s guest post with you, as part of the ongoing celebrations of 200 years of Mansfield Park. Rose lives in Massachusetts, and her favourite books include Harry Potter, by J.K. Rowling, Percy Jackson and the Olympians, by Rick Riordan, The Mortal Instruments series, by Cassandra Clare, Will Grayson, Will Grayson, by John Green, and Cornelia and the Audacious Escapades of the Somerset Sisters, by Lesley M. Blume. This last one, she says, is “the sweetest, saddest, happiest, book I will ever read in my entire life,” and she tells me her favourite word from that book is “defenestrate.” I hope you enjoy reading her review.
Can I first say that it has got to be tough to fit such a giant book into this tiny, cute, little illustrated thing. I read Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and it was big and complicated, mainly because the characters were too. This adaptation was really interesting to read and I haven’t read the full Mansfield Park so I knew nothing about what was supposed to or not supposed to happen. Just after I finished reading I was disappointed. The characters were a little boring and Fanny just annoyed me.
I thought it over more and realized that of course the characters are flat; this thing was a little over 50 pages. Fanny wasn’t annoying, she was human. A lot of characters I see are brave and strong and smart, their only flaw being their pride and overconfidence. It is rare and kind of neat to see someone uncomfortable and weak who does turn out to be the hero of the story.
Something else I was uncomfortable with was how unclear it was whether or not Edmund loves Fanny back. The point of view we saw made it seem one-sided. The short amount of space we had to let this happen made it seem like he wasn’t over Mary but he “needed” a wife. This made me feel almost like Fanny was being taken advantage of because she was so adoring. I was and still am curious to see what really happened.
These ideas, although simplified, need more explanation and depth for me to get them. This adaptation made me want to read the original book and hopefully will do the same for other young people. I honestly can’t wait until I see the characters as they really are and watch them grow. I am glad I read this to help me understand and grab my interest but it isn’t all that great on its own. My conclusion: read Mansfield Park in its entirety.
Read more about introducing Austen’s novels to younger readers on my page “Jane Austen for Kids.”
Wow! Rose sounds like quite a sophisticated intelligent and delightful person! Her analysis of this much shortened and simplified Mansfield Park sounds very astute! ( I have read and given to a friend the P&P version, so am a little familiar with the style.) I feel she is right on! This story would be very difficult to do justice in an abridged and simplified version, I would think. And I loved her favorite word, defenestrate… I looked it up as it was new to me! Thanks so much, Sarah and Rose for this post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, Rose! I love your take on this simplified version of MP…you are obviously an intelligent young lady. I am not sure that the complete version will put your concerns to rest, as I feel your concern for the Edmund/Fanny wrap-up even having read the full version of MP. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow – you were able to get at a couple of the very core issues – both in the story, and in all the discussions I’ve heard of this novel. Many people find Fanny boring and annoying at the same time, and many others feel that Edmund doesn’t love Fanny enough and is not worthy of her. These are hard nuggets to get from reading the whole novel, so perhaps, the authors of this book-let have been able to get at the heart of the matter. Bravo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was and still am curious to see what really happened.
You’re not alone, Rose! 🙂
Thank you for your review. I have had mixed feelings about this series since it first came out, though I have the S&S rewrite in my possession now and it seemed like a charming story from Margaret’s point of view for younger readers. I think you are ready to read the full version, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have bought Mansfield Park on iBooks. I’m starting it as soon as I finish Wicked by Gregory Maguire. I think I will like it better than the smaller version. Thank you to anyone who comments for just reading something that I wrote. My parents will be hearing about how awesome all of you are for weeks.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m delighted to hear that you’ve bought MP, Rose, and I hope you’ll consider writing about your experience of reading it so that we can all hear what you think. I agree with all the great things everyone has said about you, and I feel very lucky to have you as my friend and as a contributor to my blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I, too, have mixed feelings about abridged books. (And movies, as well!) They can get you interested in reading something, but they can leave out vital parts of character development and plot in the interest of space. I grew up with tons of Reader’s Digest Condensed Books in our home (Mom subscribed to them for years!) and enjoyed many of them. But, once you read the original, you really see how much is left out. Thanks, Rose, for such a thoughtful critique!
LikeLike
Pingback: Fandom Park: Train-tanic | FanFiction Fridays