Tags
ambition, books, Fiction, Jane Austen, Jane Austen's Letters, JASNA, JASNA Eastern Pennsylvania, literature, Philadelphia, Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, writing
I went to Philadelphia last weekend to speak on Jane Austen and ambition at a JASNA Eastern Pennsylvania meeting, and my favourite part of the trip was the lively discussion after my talk about whether Austen saw ambition as a vice or a virtue. It was wonderful to discuss this controversial question with so many smart people who know Austen’s novels and letters so well.
The conversation inspired me to consider what I want to do next with this topic. Blog posts? A new essay on ambition, focusing on a specific novel? (Or perhaps, someday, a book on Austen and ambition?) I’ll have to spend some more time thinking about these questions. For now, if you’d like to know more about my talk, you might be interested in reading what Deborah Yaffe (author of Among the Janeites) wrote on her blog about the event: “Austen, ambition and Emsley.” It was such fun to see Deborah and other JASNA friends both old and new, and to explore this exciting topic with them.
Here are two of of my favourite passages about ambition in Austen’s novels:
Mrs. Dashwood and Edward Ferrars discuss ambition in Sense and Sensibility, Chapter 17:
“You have no ambition, I well know. Your wishes are all moderate.”
“As moderate as those of the rest of the world, I believe. I wish as well as every body else to be perfectly happy; but like every body else it must be in my own way. Greatness will not make me so.”
I love how Mrs. Dashwood tells, rather than asks, Edward about his ambition. She’s trying to reassure him it’s all right that he lacks professional ambition. But in fact he has very high ambitions of a different kind.
Lady Catherine to Elizabeth Bennet in Pride and Prejudice, Chapter 56:
“Do not imagine, Miss Bennet, that your ambition will ever be gratified.”
If Elizabeth had been ambitious about “marrying up,” she could have accepted Darcy’s first proposal.
And then in Austen’s letters, the best line about ambition is “I wore my Aunt’s gown & handkercheif, & my hair was at least tidy, which was all my ambition” (20 November 1800).

On my run on Sunday morning I stopped at Independence Hall to take a picture and to read about the Liberty Bell.
I had a fabulous weekend in Philadelphia and I’m grateful to Paul Savidge, Regional Coordinator, and members of the Board and Region for inviting me to visit. It was a weekend of good books and good conversations, and that made me very happy. (Good food, too….)
Thanks, Sarah — it was great to see you and hear your interesting talk! Good luck with the next steps. . .
LikeLike
It was so kind of you to write about the talk, Deborah. It was a lovely surprise to see you there. I do wish I could be in the audience this coming Sunday to hear you talk about the Janeites.
LikeLike
I think Jane Austen was intensely ambitious regarding her writing career, as befits one of the greatest authors in the history of literature. She knew she was the best writer in English since Shakespeare and Milton, so it truly was ambition “under good regulation” as she might have put it.
I disagree with Deborah as to Henry Austen and James Edward Austen-Leigh having innocent motivation in presenting a false image of Jane to the public. They were intent on concealing her true nature, because there were way too many thinly veiled satirical allusions to real people in her novels, including the Prince Regent and several members of the Austen family.
LikeLike
Thanks very much for commenting, Arnie. I agree with you — I think she was very ambitious. And I think she did have some idea of just how good her writing was. Yes, absolutely, she is right up there with Shakespeare and Milton. Thanks for your comments on the way her family represented her after her death. I’ll have to think more about that. You think they were intentionally misleading people, then.
LikeLike
I am so glad you Agree about JA’s ambition! As for the intentional misleading of the world by James Edward A-L in particular, if you search in my blog for “JEAL” you’ll fibd more than a dozen posts about his numerous deceptions- Emily Auerbach identified several in a 2005 article but that was only the tip of an ugly iceberg- he was among other things trying to conceal that his iultimate inheritance from aunt Leigh Perrot was at the expense of the Austen women, and even exacerbated Jane’s soon to be fatal illness!
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a tantalising glimpse into a fascinating subject! I really think you should write a book. In the meantime, I’ve been doing some thinking about the text you quote.
The Oxford online Dictionary defines ambition as:
1.A strong desire to do or achieve something:
2.[mass noun] Desire and determination to achieve success:
Origin. Middle English: via Old French from Latin ambitio(n-), from ambire ‘go around (canvassing for votes)’.
What does Mrs Dashwood mean, then? “Your wishes are all moderate,” she says. He says he wants to be happy like everybody else. But his desire doesn’t seem to be strong enough. So he wouldn’t be ambitious in either sense of the word. This becomes clearer when he discusses his choice of profession: “It has been, and is, and probably will always be a heavy misfortune to me, that I have had no necessary business to engage me, no profession to give me employment, or afford me any thing like independence. But unfortunately my own nicety, and the nicety of my friends, have made me what I am, an idle, helpless being …I always preferred the church, as I still do. But that was not smart enough for my family.” He’s refused to join the army, being too old for the Navy, and having “no inclination for the law.” How is he to achieve his dream of domesticity and a quiet private life, depending as he does on his mother, who has very different “ambitions” for him as we have been told in Chapter 3? She’s actually ambitious in the etymological sense, as she would want “to get him into Parliament” 🙂 It doesn’t help that he tends to fall in love with impecunious girls his family disapprove of … So, while it must have been a relief to hear that Mrs Dashwood doesn’t frown on his want of ambition in the second sense, he’s not any closer to attaining happiness.
There is plenty of this second kind of ambition in JA’s novels, which by and large focuses on wealth or social standing or both. Is that a virtue or a vice? On the one hand, she portrays all sorts of climbing, greedy, bullying, manipulating, infuriating characters that we are invited to dislike, hate, scorn, and often laugh at. On the other, Elinor thinks that money has a lot to do with happiness, and even romantic Marianne acknowledges the need for “a competence”. The amount in question would range from a thousand to two thousand pounds a year: “a family cannot well be maintained on a smaller.” And no one seems to be more determined to succeed than Captain Wentworth, the hero of Persuasion: “Captain Wentworth had no fortune … But he was confident that he should soon be rich: full of life and ardour, he knew that he should soon have a ship, and soon be on a station that would lead to everything he wanted. He had always been lucky; he knew he knew he should be so still.” He achieves “earlier prosperity than could be reasonably calculated on. All his sanguine expectations, all his confidence had been justified. His genius and ardour had seemed to foresee and to command his prosperous path.” Now he wants to marry a woman of “a strong mind, with sweetness of manner.”
So, I’m inclined to conclude, rather tentatively, that: 1) we all want to be happy; 2) we may differ as to where happiness lies; 3) “grandeur” is not necessary but money matters; 4) neither wealth nor social prestige should constitute a person’s main goal in life.
LikeLike
Monica, thank you very much for your thoughtful comments on this question. I really appreciate your contribution to the discussion! There are so many great examples of Austen characters talking about their ambitions. I do think I might need to write a book. I definitely need to expand the essay or write a second paper, perhaps this time more specifically on Persuasion, which, as you point out, offers a wonderful example in the career of Captain Wentworth.
I found Samuel Johnson’s definition of the term very helpful: he distinguishes between ambition for preferment and ambition for excellence or greatness. I used that distinction when I talked about Edward. So much of this depends on how we, or Austen’s characters, define success. I am absolutely fascinated with this topic and will keep exploring it to figure out the connections among the terms ambition, success, happiness, and so on. I suppose we all have to figure out what it means to be happy. And I like the way you’ve brought “grandeur” into the conversation. Does one have to be grand to be successful? Who gets to decide what constitutes success? And what is “a competence”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
fascinating conversation! The issue seems to come down to the definition of ‘ambition’. Can it be personal or must it be about ‘grandeur’ and accomplishment as the world acknowledges it? Questions I’ve been asking myself for a long time (and more so as my books do not find representation!). I am looking forward to one of your remarkably well thought-out projects, Sarah.
LikeLike
Thank you, Leslie! It’s a complicated question, for sure. What does it mean to be “accomplished”? Does one get to decide for one’s self or will the world’s judgement get in the way? The different definitions of ambition continue to fascinate me and I can see this project getting bigger and bigger. (But how ambitious a project do I want to take on? I still have to figure that out.) Thanks for your interest in the conversation — and all best wishes for your own writing projects, too.
LikeLike
Glad you enjoyed Philadelphia. I really like the Betsy Ross House tour there. The concept of ambition as a virtue or vice in Austen is an interesting one.
LikeLike
I haven’t toured the Betsy Ross House yet and will add that to my list of things to do next time. Thanks! And thank you for your interest in this question about ambition in Austen’s novels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you again Sarah for visiting Philadelphia and speaking with our region about Jane Austen and ambition. It was a provocative talk that captured – as you saw and heard – the imaginations of all of our members and guests in attendance. The energy around the topic suggests that you are on to something important (and perhaps even controversial!) Come visit us again.
LikeLike
It was an extraordinary weekend and I enjoyed all the conversations immensely. Thank you again, Paul, for everything. I’d love to visit again.
LikeLike
Ooh. I really enjoyed this take on Austen and Ambition. Yes please explore further w/posts or essays or a book. There seems to be some tension in that she wants to reward ambition and it proves one worthy (Captain Wentworth, Col Brandon). But then men with no ambition seem like such fops (Mr Hurst, Mr Rushworth, Willoughby, ). Edward Ferrars seems in between … his ambition is for a quiet life but that is still worthwhile. Robert Martin also seems to have a similar quiet ambition. Then we have all the ambitious women (Lucy Steele, Mrs Clay, etc.) but at the same time Austen seems to decry the whole marry poor for love thing. A lot of tension and play around ambition in her works…
Now off to read your talk at Deborah Yaffe’s site!
LikeLike
I love your examples — thanks, Sarah! The characters without ambition are interesting as well and I need to think more about how that works. I’ve been thinking about Catherine Morland…. Thanks for your interest in this project.
LikeLike
Sarah,
This long thread of comments induced me to do a quick word search in JA’s novels for the words “ambitious” and “ambition”—the two most entertaining and interesting ones, to me, were these two, which I believe are actually a matched set:
First, Mary Crawford’s cynical and accurate take on the ambitions of clergymen like Dr. Grant:
“Oh! no doubt he is very sincere in preferring an income ready made, to the trouble of working for one; and has the best intentions of doing nothing all the rest of his days but eat, drink, and grow fat. It is indolence, Mr. Bertram, indeed. Indolence and love of ease; a want of all laudable ambition, of taste for good company, or of inclination to take the trouble of being agreeable, which make men clergymen. A clergyman has nothing to do but be slovenly and selfish—read the newspaper, watch the weather, and quarrel with his wife. His curate does all the work, and the business of his own life is to dine.”
I think Mary makes a very persuasive case. While the young Edmund Bertram may give no sign as of yet of turning into a Dr. Grant 20 years down the road, Mary, a shrewd judge of human nature, might have good reason to be concerned that the position will eventually shape the man in undesirable ways.
And the non-fiction companion to the above passage is Jane Austen’s fascinated, cynical, and accurate (and yes, Mary Crawford-like) take on the ambitions of a political rising star like the young Mr. Lushington from the Godmersham social set, written in October, 1813, perhaps at the very same moment as she was writing that dialog for her alter-ego, Mary:
“We are certain of some visitors tomorrow…On Thursday Mr. Lushington MP for Canterbury and Manager of the Lodge Hounds, dines here and stays the night…..I shall be glad to have our numbers a little reduced, and by the time you receive this we shall be only a family, though a large family, party. Mr. Lushington goes to-morrow.
Now I must speak of him, and I like him very much. I am sure he is clever, and a man of taste. He got a volume of Milton last night, and spoke of it with warmth. He is quite an M.P., very smiling, with an exceeding good address and readiness of language. I am rather in love with him. I dare say he is ambitious and insincere. He puts me in mind of Mr. Dundas. He has a wide smiling mouth, and very good teeth, and something the same complexion and nose.”
I love the elegantly scandalous conjunction of “I am rather in love with him” with “I dare say he is ambitious and insincere”, followed immediately by an assessment of his facial features, as if JA were a master sizing up a prospective new servant.
Aren’t you reminded of Henry Crawford?
Jane Austen was capable of the greatness of mind of being able to admire certain aspects of the personality of a gifted rake, even as she was wary of such men.
Thanks for prompting me to take a closer look at this word in JA’s writings!
ARNIE
LikeLike
I’m rather in love with Mr. Lushington myself. And the idea of “laudable ambition” is very interesting. Makes me think of “proper pride.” I’m happy to hear you’ve been inspired to look up these examples, Arnie. I’m now seeing and hearing the words “ambition” and “ambitious” everywhere. (Including in the “Anne and Gilbert” musical I saw today in PEI — the song “You’re Island Through and Through” says you must be from Prince Edward Island “if you think the man who thinks he’s special is a fool, and someone too ambitious will taste your ridicule.”)
LikeLike
🙂 now I’m wondering whether Gilbert Blyth owes his first name to Gilbert of Gilbert and Sullivan.
I’ll be blogging soon about Mr. Lushington – I see another Mansfield Park angle there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: “We must think the best” | Sarah Emsley
Pingback: Anne Shirley’s Ambitions | Sarah Emsley
Pingback: Reading, Writing, Running | Sarah Emsley
Pingback: Discovering Mutton in Emma: The Quest to Please the Principals’ Palates | Sarah Emsley