Tags
ambition, Anne of Green Gables, Anne's House of Dreams, books, Canadian literature, Emily of New Moon, Fiction, Jane Austen, L.M. Montgomery, literature, writers, writing
“Young Dr. Blythe” is a very busy man and he’s often away from the little white house he and Anne share near Four Winds Harbour at the start of their married life, but at least we do get to hear more about him in Anne’s House of Dreams. Anne says Gilbert is “hardly ever home except for a few hours in the wee sma’s. He’s really working himself to death. So many of the over-harbour people send for him now” (Chapter 22). His medical practice gets a great deal of attention in the second half of the novel, when he suggests to Anne that surgery might cure their neighbour Dick Moore’s “memory and faculties” (Chapter 29). I don’t know much about the procedure he recommends (and I’d be interested to read more about this aspect of the novel – let me know if you have any suggestions about essays on neurosurgery and the novels of L.M. Montgomery), but I have to say I did like the chapter in which “Gilbert and Anne Disagree,” because it brought back the antagonism that we first encountered in the infamous “Carrots” scene in Anne of Green Gables.
Back in May, I wrote about how disappointed I was that Gilbert was almost entirely absent from the story in Anne of Windy Poplars, the fourth book in L.M. Montgomery’s “Anne” series. I didn’t do a great job of keeping up with all the books in the “Green Gables Readalong” that Lindsey Reeder hosted from January to August this year, but I did read Anne’s House of Dreams in the late spring – and here I am now, writing about it in late September….
Here are just a few of the many other things I liked about Anne’s House of Dreams, in addition to the disagreement between Anne and Gilbert. I liked the way Montgomery explores Anne’s response to the sorrow that comes to her as a young wife and mother, and the way Anne’s marriage is contrasted with her neighbour Leslie’s in such a way that Anne realizes, even in the midst of that sorrow, just how fortunate she is. I liked the chapter (21) in which Leslie confesses to Anne that “there have been times this past winter and spring when I have hated you” and the two of them become close friends after they discuss the reasons for this hatred.
I liked the conversation Anne and Miss Cornelia have about obituaries: Miss Cornelia asks, “Have you ever noticed what heaps of good people die, Anne, dearie? It’s kind of pitiful. Here’s ten obituaries, and every one of them saints and models, even the men. Here’s old Peter Stimson, who has ‘left a large circle of friends to mourn his untimely loss.’ Lord, Anne, dearie, that man was eighty, and everybody who knew him had been wishing him dead these thirty years.” (This passage makes me think of what Jane Austen says to her sister Cassandra about their neighbour Mrs. Holder: “Only think of Mrs. Holder’s being dead! – Poor woman, she has done the only thing in the World she could possibly do, to make one cease to abuse her” [October 14, 1813].) Miss Cornelia thinks “obituary” is an ugly word. “There’s only one uglier word that I know of, and that’s relict. Lord, Anne, dearie, I may be an old maid, but there’s this comfort in it – I’ll never be any man’s ‘relict’” (Chapter 28).
I did find it a bit hard to believe that in this small community, almost everyone Anne meets turns out to be a kindred spirit: Leslie (eventually), Miss Cornelia, the lighthouse keeper Captain Jim, and Owen Ford, the writer who comes to board at Leslie’s house for the summer. And while I remembered that Anne treasures her friendship with Captain Jim, I had forgotten the details of what he says about women writers. He’s pleased to find that Owen is “what he called a ‘real writing man’” and he’s quite ready to regard him as “a superior being” – superior, that is, to women who dare to write: he “knew that Anne wrote, but he had never taken that fact very seriously. Captain Jim thought women were delightful creatures, who ought to have the vote, and everything else they wanted, bless their hearts; but he did not believe they could write.” The reason he gives is that “A writing woman never knows when to stop; that’s the trouble. The p’int of good writing is to know when to stop.”
I agree with him about that very last bit. Good writing has as much to do with what you leave out and when you stop as with where you begin and what you put in. But I was disappointed to find that this so-called “kindred spirit” is so dismissive of Anne’s writing. And I was disappointed that Anne’s only response to what Captain Jim says here is to invite him to tell a story: “‘Mr. Ford wants to hear some of your stories, Captain Jim,’ said Anne. ‘Tell him the one about the captain who went crazy and imagined he was the Flying Dutchman’” (Chapter 24).
I had forgotten that in this book Anne herself is dismissive of her writing. Here’s the conversation she has with Owen when he first arrives and tells her he’s so impressed with the beauty of his temporary home that “if inspiration comes from beauty, I should certainly be able to begin my great Canadian novel here” (Chapter 23).
“You haven’t begun it yet?” asked Anne.
“Alack-a-day, no. I’ve never been able to get the right central idea for it. It lurks beyond me – it allures – and beckons – and recedes – I almost grasp it and it is gone. Perhaps amid this peace and loveliness, I shall be able to capture it. Miss Bryant tells me that you write.”
“Oh, I do little things for children. I haven’t done much since I was married. And I have no designs on a great Canadian novel,” laughed Anne. “That is quite beyond me.”
Owen Ford laughed too.
“I dare say it is beyond me as well. All the same I mean to have a try at it someday, if I can ever get time.”
Oh, Anne! What happened to “I’m just as ambitious as ever,” from that last chapter of Anne of Green Gables? “I do little things for children”? In her biography of Montgomery, Mary Rubio notes that “Less than three weeks after finishing Anne’s House of Dreams Maud began writing a version of her life called ‘The Story of My Career’ for publication in Everywoman’s World, a popular magazine for women.” Later published as The Alpine Path (1975), this story opens with a combination of modesty about her accomplishments – “Could my long, uphill struggle, through many quiet, uneventful years, be termed a ‘career’?” – and determination to succeed as a writer – Montgomery writes that to climb the path to “heights sublime” and “true and honoured fame” has been “the key-note of my every aim and ambition.” She was herself ambitious, and, as Rubio discusses in Chapter 19 of Lucy Maud Montgomery: The Gift of Wings, her reputation suffered when she was “re-categorized as ‘a children’s writer’ and ‘provincial,’” after which “most male critics who belittled Maud’s books did not actually read them, they just accepted the labels pinned on them.”
I found it hard to believe that after all his struggles to write, Owen writes his “great Canadian novel” so quickly, in one summer, and then has “not much doubt that he would find a publisher.” He records the stories Captain Jim has been telling for years, and when he has completed the manuscript, “He knew that he had written a great book – a book that would score a wonderful success – a book that would live. He knew that it would bring him both fame and fortune” (Chapter 25). It’s all so easy! Soon the book is “heading the lists of the best sellers” (Chapter 40). It made me wonder why we don’t all try to write the great Canadian novel. But perhaps one has to be “a real writing man” to achieve that ambition.
In a way, I wish I hadn’t gone back to reread the later books in the “Anne” series, because when I was very young, the first books in the series inspired me to become a writer, and it’s been somewhat disappointing to find out what happens to Anne’s literary ambitions. But at the same time, it’s been fascinating to make comparisons with what I remembered from my childhood.
When I read Anne of the Island as a child in Halifax, I didn’t realize Kingsport was based on the city I lived in, or that Redmond College was based on Dalhousie University, where my father was (and is) an English professor. Over the past couple of years I’ve enjoyed exploring Montgomery’s Nova Scotia connection in that novel and in her journals. (See “Attending Redmond College with Anne Shirley” and “L.M. Montgomery in Nova Scotia.”) I had vague memories of disliking Anne of Windy Poplars when I was ten, but I had forgotten why, and when I reread it in April, I was interested to discover that immediately after Anne and Gilbert get engaged, he moves to the sidelines instead of continuing on as a central character in her story. (See “Anne and Gilbert After the Happy Ending.”) And I remember thinking it was quite magical that one of Anne’s closest friends in Anne’s House of Dreams was a lighthouse keeper, but I either didn’t notice Captain Jim’s dismissive attitude toward women and writing or I forgot about it over the years.
Eventually I’ll probably reread Anne of Ingleside, Rainbow Valley, and Rilla of Ingleside as well, even though I’ve missed the chance to blog about them in the appropriate months for this particular “readalong.” I’m especially interested in Rilla, and her preference for straight roads (as contrasted with her mother’s love of the “bend in the road”). At the moment I’m torn between thinking I ought to revisit the “Emily” series, which was also part of what inspired me at the ages of ten and eleven to want to be a writer, and thinking I just might want to hang onto my childhood memories of those books for a little longer.
As I was getting close to the end of the Green Gables readalong, I was thinking that it would fun to re-visit the Emily books next. I remember loving them as much, just in a different way. And, if I remember correctly, Emily makes more of a career out of writing than Anne did, so maybe it would be just the thing for you.
I have to admit that I question the fact that most people assume Anne has lost her ambition just because she isn’t writing as much as she once imagined she would. Ambitions can change over time, and, as a stay-at-home mom, I believe that being a stay-at-home mom is a career choice in and of itself (even though we don’t get payed) and doesn’t mean we have no ambition. It’s fulfilling and rewarding and important. I will forever defend Anne’s decision and what most people see as a loss of ambition. (But that’s just me. I can see why it would be disappointing to writers to see her lose her interest in it.)
I also loved the disagreement between Gilbert and Anne in Anne’s House of Dreams. They have another little misunderstanding of another sort at the end of Anne of Ingleside that is also fun. I would like to see more of their marriage in the books, but maybe as a child I would have thought differently.
I’m anxious for you to read Rilla – I want to know what you think. I find it so different from the rest of them, and had forgotten (or I was too young to appreciate) how much about the war it is. So good.
LikeLike
You’re absolutely right, Naomi, that choosing to be a stay-at-home mom isn’t a sign of a lack of ambition. It’s a different kind of ambition. I’m reminded of what Edward Ferrars says in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility when he talks about ambition: he says, “I wish as well as every body else to be perfectly happy; but like every body else it must be in my own way.” He’s ambitious about finding perfect happiness rather than about trying to advance his career. The contrasts among different types of ambition are part of what I find so fascinating about this topic.
I was tempted to skip Anne of Ingleside and Rainbow Valley and go straight to Rilla, but I think I’ll slow down and read them in order. (After I finish Marina Endicott’s Close to Hugh and Lawrence Hill’s Any Known Blood and Carol McDougall’s Wake the Stone Man….) I can’t remember at all what it is that Anne and Gilbert disagree about in Anne of Ingleside. Are you (or is anyone from the Green Gables Readalong) thinking about proposing a readalong for the Emily books?
LikeLike
I did think about it, actually (an Emily readalong), but I wanted to wait a bit and take a little break from the other one. At least Emily would be only 3 months long, instead of 8. Maybe starting in January again?
I love that quote from Sense and Sensibility!
You’re reading some good books right now. Any Known Blood is one of those books that I have been meaning to read for years (since reading Book of Negroes), but I just haven’t. I hope you’re enjoying it! I have his newest ready to be picked up at the library right now. How do you like the other 2?
LikeLike
I’m glad you like that line from S&S. I really like Close to Hugh so far, including the puns (and I wasn’t sure what I’d think of them). I love the part about trying not to cry in the grocery store — Della thinking about chickens, eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt, grapes, and raisins, and about how everything becomes something else. Looking forward to Any Known Blood and Wake the Stone Man (and The Illegal, which I just bought a couple of days ago for my mother — she’s promised to lend it to me as soon as she finishes it).
I’d definitely be interested in an Emily readalong. I’m hosting a series of guest posts on Austen’s Emma from December to March, so I might not have time to write about the Emily books until the spring. But if you decide to start in January, I’ll still be keen to read what you and others have to say about those three novels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I will definitely let you know if I decide anything!
Glad you like Close to Hugh – I did, too, but I think some people felt it hard to get through. I loved Hugh. And, I could relate to so much of it – just ordinary life (like trying not to cry at the grocery store).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Sarah,
I found your blog through the excellent series of posts celebrating “Mansfield Park” last year, but I was also delighted to discover your interest in LMM, probably the most important author of my childhood. You inspired me to re-read her books again and comparing my childhood reception of Anne’s story to how I see it now is quite fascinating.
I’ve recently re-read “Anne’s House of Dreams” as well and I can sympathize with most of your remarks. But my disappointment in Anne was even greater than yours. I don’t blame her for abandoning her literary ambition, this I can understand – after all, she is fulfilling the most important of her dreams: being a mother. Perhaps she is not less ambitious than before, only her ambitions changed. But on the whole, she is only a shadow of her former self. What happened to this independent, thinking girl she used to be? It seems that she is quite content to agree with Gilbert’s opinions and doesn’t need to have ones of her own. When Gilbert and Captain Jim are having Serious Discussions About Serious Matters, she sits quietly playing with a cat or admiring a sunset. Yes, one time she ventures to disagree with her husband, but LMM sets their dispute in such a way to proof that HE is a wise man and SHE is a silly creature with her silly feminine fears. (I find the whole case of Dick Moore very far-fetched, but that’s another thing and I can forgive LMM much more than other writers ;)). I was quite surprised that LMM decided to make Anne a proper obedient wife and I wonder why she did that. Another surprise: Gilbert was a perfect boyfriend, but as a husband he is quite annoying 😉
But Miss Cornelia is quite delightful and I love the sea and the winds (one can never feel the sea’s proximity in Avonlea) and the lighthouse. So on the whole it was a very pleasant reading 🙂
Greetings from Poland (where LMM is probably even more popular than in Canada)!
LikeLike
I see what you mean, Natalia, about how Anne doesn’t seem as independent in this novel as she used to. I think she hasn’t abandoned her literary ambitions — she is, after all, writing things for children — but she’s lost a lot of the confidence she had before about her writing, and she accepts too easily the idea that writing for children is not as important as writing for adults. I wish she disagreed more often with Gilbert and Owen Ford and Captain Jim, instead of accepting everyone so quickly as a kindred spirit. What happened to the Anne who stood up for herself after her first encounters with Mrs. Lynde and Gilbert?
Thank you for writing from Poland! I’m happy that you discovered the blog and that you enjoyed the Mansfield Park celebrations.
LikeLike
I’ve never actually read the Emily books! I wonder what that would be like as an adult!
I agree with so much of what you’ve written here and yet, when I read the books it never bothered me. I think as Anne gets older, her creator does too and I think she was maybe tired of fighting so hard. That she thought she was giving Anne an out by allowing her to be content to write more casually.
I agree with Naomi that Rilla is very different from the rest of the Anne books. Rilla comes of age just when the whole world is changing.
LikeLike
Montgomery was also getting quite tired of writing about Anne in those later books, so maybe that’s part of it. I’d love to hear what you think of the Emily books! And I am determined to make time to read Rilla. I really want to compare it with Edith Wharton’s A Son at the Front. All I need is more time — but they’re all on my list. I just read your post about all the books you got from the library recently (and Naomi’s post about the same topic) and then I looked at what I have out from the library, and now I can’t decide whether I’m inspired or exhausted.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I remember reading all the books in the Anne series and being very disappointed in everything after Anne of Avonlea… I felt that by that point, someone was just trading on the Anne name, and putting much lesser stories there. The spark and sparkle of Anne was gone, and she was just an ordinary woman… These were my 10-year-old thoughts, and I can see that I was probably right. (I’ve never gone back to re-read those, though I’ve read of Anne of Green Gables and Anne of Avonlea over and over…
I can’t help but wonder if by the time of Anne’s House of Dreams, L.M. was disillusioned by being relegated to the category of “children’s books” and this was a way of showing her displeasure. Here, she’d worked so hard for so long, and been dismissed so easily, while all around her, she saw men who dashed off manuscripts over a summer (and of someone else’s stories, mind you!) and easily found publishers… She couldn’t come right out and say anything, but it really resonates with me that this was how she might get her revenge, by showing it for exactly what it was…
I remember the first time I realized that a man I knew had risen to a position of authority and respect, and the only thing he had to recommend him, that I could tell, was that he was tall. That’s when I realized how much harder women had to work to be recognized… This sort of feels the same.
Julie
LikeLike
Absence of spark and sparkle — that’s an interesting way of putting it, Julie. To borrow Jane Austen’s words, then, Anne is no longer as “light & bright & sparkling” as she was in the earlier books. Interesting theory about what might have inspired the description of Owen’s quick success. I’ll have to think more about that. Thank you! It’s just so easy for him. No bend in that road at all — the path to success lies straight ahead. Owen’s probably tall, too, is he? I’ve forgotten. I remember that he’s good looking and charming. Ha! — I just looked it up, and his height is the second thing mentioned. Anne admits that he’s “well-looking,” and then we learn that he’s “tall and broad-shouldered, with thick, brown hair, finely-cut nose and chin, large and brilliant dark-gray eyes.” He does have to endure for a little while before he’s rewarded with happiness and “love triumphant and perfect,” but it’s only for a few chapters. So he gets personal happiness AND literary success.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It reminds me of an old joke – a manager is told he needs to promote someone, so he tells his staff to gather everyone’s personnel files, and that they will have to give everyone aptitude and intelligence tests, then do a cross-referenced analysis. Then he thinks to himself – “… and then promote the tallest.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi again, Sarah … couldn’t post on your site. But re Gilbert’s absence from Anne of Windy Willows (as it’s known here) … Anne does write him love letters whenever her pen nib isn’t scratchy, and although they’re
understandably not reproduced, there are plenty of them!
Or, I’ve heard that Poplars is/was actually a version expurgated for the American market …. is all this left out in the Northern Hemisphere?
I loved the book myself as I was also a teacher and could empathise.
Julia
LikeLike
Oh, interesting — I don’t know the story of whether the text of the novel is different. I thought it was just the title that was changed, because of the similarity to The Wind in the Willows. Do you know any more about what was left out?
And yes — I can see how many of those stories would appeal to teachers!
LikeLike
Hi Sarah,
Funnily enough, I am currently working on a Uni essay based around the infamous ‘Carrots’ scene:) I am analysing a 510 word excerpt from the scene using systemic-functional grammar to illustrate the dialectical relationship between text and context. Having unpacked the linguistic features of this scene carefully using Halliday’s ideational, interpersonal and textual functions of language and the three aspects of context, I am in even more awe of Montgomery’s writing skill. Even after multiple re-readings, this scene remains fresh and entertaining, which is testament to Montgomery’s exceptional writing ability.
I thought your observations about gender were so insightful – I can’t recall the scene where Captain Jim disparages women writers, so I will have to revisit this book at some point over the summer break, when I have finished my Uni studies and finally have time to read what I want! It has been a bonus to be able to choose a Montgomery text for my systemic-functional grammar essay, as reading and researching Montgomery texts is never work for me:)
LikeLike
Sue, that’s great that you can incorporate Montgomery’s work when you’re writing essays about grammar. I confess I didn’t understand any of what you said about systemic-functional grammar, but it makes me happy to know that you’re continuing to find new things in a passage that’s an old favourite. When does your summer break begin? November or December? I’m looking forward to one more fall trip to PEI next month. I’m thinking now that I should take Anne of Ingleside with me.
LikeLike
I hear what you’re saying about Captain Jim, but I always think of him as a creature of his time. Captain Jim is probably like Montgomery’s grandfather, and uncles and even father in being dismissive of women’s amibtions. I compare him to Matthew who thought everything that Anne did was splendid – and it galls me more that Jem is named for James Matthew, not Matthew James, when I personally think Matthew had the more lasting effect on Anne. I also reflect on how “AHoD” was written during WW1, when Montgomery herself was birthing her own children, and perhaps being ridiculed for persisting with writing while she was being wife and mother. I always wonder how critical Ewen McDonald might have been. I think Montgomery does infuse AHoD with some of her dread of this period (the war) in history. I prefer to think that like the Anne who decided to keep her own private thoughts to herself while she was in her early teens, sharing less of herself after that first turbulent year at Green Gables, Montgomery was keeping her own private thoughts to herself too (in those journals). I believe she did wonder what she could achieve as a female writer, and did worry about her ability to break from the Anne saga. Criticism received from the Canadian literary community in the 1920’s (mostly men) did upset her sensitive soul greatly. Having Anne be self deprecating might seem as if she is agreeing with the critics, but I prefer to think she is merely protecting her soul and writing in secret. Yes, it’s very disappointing that Owen Ford scored big with his first novel, rather than letting Anne be its author, but if it was as much Captain Jim’s and the Schoolmaster’s story, as Owen’s, I’ll let him have the kudos. After all, Montgomery wrote her own great Canadian novel – she just didn’t realise it, because of how L.C. Page treated her, and how it was pigeon-holed into children’s literature so resolutely.
LikeLike
Excellent point, Kellie, about Montgomery as the author of a great Canadian novel. When I think of Montgomery and her reputation, I’m often reminded of what Edith Wharton said about her writing: “As my work reaches its close, I feel so sure that it is either nothing, or far more than they know.” “They” (that is, the Canadian literary community) might not have appreciated what she had created in Anne of Green Gables and her other works, but I hope she had at least some idea of its significance. I see what you mean about how she, like Anne, might have preferred to keep her thoughts to herself. And yes, it makes sense that Captain Jim is a man of his time. But why does Anne have to accept him so uncritically, and why is he presented as a true kindred spirit, when surely Montgomery’s grandfather and uncles were not? Although, now that I think of it, perhaps the comparison with her father is a helpful one — she was very close to him, wasn’t she, even though he was not as supportive as he might have been. I’ll have to go back and read more about their relationship. Thanks for prompting me to think about him, and about the connections between the Great War and the composition of this novel. I agree with you about “James Matthew” — though I’ve always loved the name Jem.
LikeLike
Sarah,
I think the reason why we are also disappointed in the rendition of Anne in AHoD revolves around the issue of kindred spirits. One would assume a kindred spirit supports you in anything and everything you do, but Anne’s list of KS always kind of puzzled me. I think Montgomery’s later use of ‘the race that knows Joseph” was more useful to describe like minded people. I was thinking of who she classed as KS-Matthew I assume, who loved and accepted everything about her unconditionally. Diana-again for the same reasons. But I don’t recall Marilla receiving the honour. I think she puts Priscilla and Stella in the category, and maybe Phillipa later, but Phil asks lots of hard questions of Anne, so maybe not. I don’t think Gilbert or Susan ever get the title. For Captain Jim to get the “KS” badge, you would expect the man to support her literary hopes as well – to be the unconditional supporter. But he clearly doubts her ability as a woman to write well, not because of her skills specifically, but as a woman generally. And because of the romance of his life as a sea captain, his stories, his long lost Margaret, and his glorious home by the sea, he gets the “KS” badge-he appeals to her romantic self. Anne’s KS friends sometimes had their limitations in intellectual challenge, but they weren’t kindred because they thought like her necessarily. Her bestowal of this honour was based on something instinctive to her and Montgomery.I’d much rather know Miss Cornelia for her observations of people, but I doubt Anne would have called her a “KS”.
LikeLike
That’s a very interesting distinction between “kindred spirits” and “the race that knows Joseph.” Thank you, Kellie, and thank you for commenting on the characters who get the “KS badge.” It’s interesting that Marilla doesn’t become one, even though she and Anne do become very close. And even though she does support Anne in her pursuit of academic goals. Like you, I don’t recall the term ever being used in relation to her. I like your point about how Captain Jim appeals to Anne’s sense of romance. After all, “kindred” doesn’t have to mean “identical.”
LikeLike
I was listening to the Anne of Avonlea audiobook yesterday and I noticed that Stephen Irving is called a kindred spirit because he understands Anne’s metaphors about romance and doesn’t need to have them explained, as Charlotta the Fourth does. That fits with the idea that the romance of Captain Jim’s life makes him a kindred spirit. I also looked up Captain Jim’s definition of what it takes to belong to “the race that knows Joseph”: “If a person sorter sees eye to eye with you, and has pretty much the same ideas about things, and the same taste in jokes.” I guess that “pretty much” is essential — similar ideas, but not identical. And I was interested to discover that Miss Cornelia is a kindred spirit after all. “With her old instinctive quickness to discern kindred spirits [Anne] knew she was going to like Miss Cornelia, in spite of uncertain oddities of opinion, and certain oddities of attire.” Miss Lavendar is described as a kindred spirit because she has an imagination – which is something Marilla doesn’t have, right? So it makes sense that no matter how much she loves Anne or supports her, she’ll never quite be a kindred spirit. Thanks very much, Kellie, for inspiring me to look into this further.
LikeLike
I really enjoyed this posting, despite having never read LMM, sorry to admit. (does seeing the TV show let me off the hook?) What I liked about your essay is the thought that when we reread a beloved book we see different things. For instance, it’s a sign of maturity and living in the world that you find it odd that “everyone is a kindred spirit” to the young Anne. When we are young this is exactly what we are looking for. It supports our ambitions to be among kindred spirits. And the lack of encouragement quoted from her friend, Captain Jim, speaks to me from a writerly perspective. I like to think when I write that I am all the characters. Also, it seems the writer too is now experienced in another, harsher world. Women have never had an easy time being taken seriously. Isn’t it possible that Anne has grown up and your childhood companion is no longer a ‘kindred spirit’?
Other than JA I hesitate to reread books. The most important books to me often have become part of me; have helped shape my world view. That’s plenty on one reading!
Thanks for this post!
LikeLike
I’m glad you enjoyed it, Leslie, even though you haven’t read LMM. Thanks for your thoughts on kindred spirits, and on the challenges that can arise when we reread books. Like you, I reread Austen all the time — without any hesitation. In fact, the importance of rereading is one of the countless things I’ve learned from her novels. I’m thinking of Elizabeth reading Darcy’s letter in anger, and then returning to read it over and over to understand it better. So — in fact I’m feeling even more inspired right now to return to the later Anne novels, and the Emily novels, precisely because I do want to revisit the books that helped shape my view of the world. I’m curious about this contrast between wanting to reread Austen all the time, and wanting to hold off on revisiting LMM. I’ll keep thinking about your question about whether the grown up Anne is no longer the same kindred spirit I encountered when I was young. Why do I assume that I ought to like both the young Anne and the older Anne? I guess because I did like them both, very much, when I was very young. If I were reading the books for the first time right now, I wouldn’t assume that I needed to like her and agree with her all the way through the series.
LikeLike
Further thoughts, after listening to Anne of Avonlea yesterday: when Anne and Gilbert disagree, we’re told that “Their usual good-comradeship and Josephian community of taste and viewpoint were sadly lacking.” This line reminds me that while I don’t always agree with Anne, and while I don’t like the way she laughs off her achievements, I can certainly understand how a woman at that time — or, really, any writer, at any time — might lack confidence in her education or her writing. I still “sorter see eye to eye” with her as an adult, even if I don’t always see eye to eye with her other kindred spirits. I’m sure I’ll always think of Anne, both child and adult, as a kindred spirit. It’s her focus on the imaginative life that makes her so interesting to me. Thanks for raising these questions, Leslie. I’m very interested in Montgomery’s definitions of “kindred spirits” and I’m also interested in this question of whether or not readers like or identify with heroines and heroes. You’re quite right that it’s Montgomery’s own imagination as a writer than enables her to see things from Captain Jim’s perspective. As Anne says in Anne of Avonlea, “What is an imagination for if not to enable you to peep at life through other people’s eyes?”
LikeLike
I always thought it interesting how Anne and Diana Barry were best friends, and I think Anne even called her a kindred spirit, even though she did not have the same sort of imagination or creativity that Anne did.
Last year in an effort to overcome burnout I reread some of my favorite books from childhood, including all the Anne books. I have reread them a couple of times as an adult so it wasn’t a first time re-read but I also hesitated to reread some of the later ones. I ended up enjoying them all however. It’s interesting what you or a commenter said about LMM being tired of Anne books when she wrote Rilla. I can see that. The first time i read it as a child, I disliked it partly because Anne was almost invisible. But it has become one of my favorite in the series. I like how it brings in history and world events. It taught me more about WWI than I remember reading in history classes in school. As an American it also makes me ashamed at how long it took America to get into the war. It seems weird to me that none of the other books in the Anne series make any reference to world events. I also find Rilla refreshing in how different she is from the child Anne. She doesn’t talk as much or use lots of flowery big words. To me she seems more down to earth and like a real girl.
LikeLike
I always liked Rilla, too, Sharon. I figured she wasn’t like Anne because she didn’t have to imagine she had the things a little girl longs for – a family, and people to love her. She had them. So she was free to be herself.
Interesting about the world events. People often comment that it’s odd that Jane Austen didn’t ever talk about what was happening in the wars, even though they affected everyone around her – especially her brothers in the Navy.
Julie
LikeLike
yes, good point Julie about Rilla not needing to imagine things as much to meet her emotional needs. I wonder if LMM also had a similar journey. I don’t know her whole life story, but it seems she had some difficult years to get through when she might also have needed her imagination to meet some of her own emotional needs. Maybe she got more secure later?
LikeLike
Very interesting points about Diana, Rilla, and imagination. The scene in which Anne and Diana meet is so funny and touching, with Diana’s skepticism about “swearing” to be friends forever, and Anne’s joy at finding a bosom friend at last. Diana doesn’t seem very imaginative in this scene (or later on), but it’s surely a good sign that she’s reading a book when Anne and Marilla arrive.
Are there references to the war or other world events in Montgomery’s other novels? Anything in the background, comparable to the presence of the militia in Meryton in P&P, for example? Something to think about as I continue to reread LMM. And I’d like to read more about what she says in her journals about the role of imagination.
LikeLike
Re: Captain Jim and his disparaging comments on women authors. I wonder if LMM wrote that as a way of both processing and combating the hurtful way she was treated as a “female author.” Kind of how both she and JA battled against hypocrisy and small mindedness in society by poking fun at hypocritical and small minded characters in their stories. Bringing things out into the open and showing how ridiculous they are in a humorous way is a great way to make a point. Though in this case since Captain Jim was such a favorite of Anne it may not have had as much of an impact. It reminds me of real life too. I, at least, have certainly had times when I felt unsupported by the people I cared about the most.
LikeLike
That’s a really good point, Sharon, about how the people we care for are not always necessarily the ones who provide consistent support, either emotional or professional. And I like the link with Austen’s sense of humour. “A woman especially, if she have the misfortune of knowing any thing, should conceal it as well as she can.”
LikeLike
Pingback: October at Ingleside | Sarah Emsley
Such a fascinating review, Sarah! I really enjoyed reading it. Perhaps especially because your opinions differ from my own. First off, I am coming to the second half of the series for the first time. So I simply fell in love with Anne and her new collection of kindred spirits from the first page. But you bring up some great points about Captain Jim and the writing of his biography. I guess I either missed that or chose to overlook it because of all the positive attributes of his character.
I think it’s neat that we can read the same book and have different parts stick with us the first time we read it and other things stick out when we reread. Maybe I will reread these books with my kids one day and will find different parts interesting or borhersome.
Anyways, I enjoyed your perspective! Thanks for linking up with #AnneReadAlong2017!
LikeLike
Thanks for reading this, Jane! It’s so interesting to hear what stands out most for others. I’ve been thinking again about what it means to revisit childhood favourites, because I’m about to reread Montgomery’s The Blue Castle for the first time in decades, and I have only a few vague memories about the story. I’ve heard from several people that it’s their favourite Montgomery novel — I don’t remember thinking that when I read it, and I’m interested to find out why it’s so beloved. I wonder if there’s any chance I’ll end up loving it more than I love Anne of Green Gables. At the moment, I think probably not! But I’m curious to find out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My list of Montgomery TBRs keeps growing! I hear good things about The Blue Castle too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: #AnneReadAlong2017: Anne’s House of Dreams, A Review – greenish bookshelf
Pingback: Nursing Clio Reframing the Pregnancy Story: On Literature, Stitching, and Lost Narratives