“Valancy was in the midst of realities after a lifetime of unrealities,” writes L.M. Montgomery in her 1926 novel The Blue Castle (Chapter 17). Her heroine rejects the colourless, conventional life she’s been leading and decides to speak the truth and pursue independence. Her mother reports that she’s said “I’ve been keeping up appearances all my life. Now I’m going in for realities. Appearances can go hang.” “Go hang!” her mother repeats in astonishment (Chapter 15).
Faced with the news that she has just one year to live, Valancy chooses to shape the story of her life, instead of continuing to allow her mother and other relatives to control everything. As Elizabeth Waterston writes in Magic Island: The Fictions of L.M. Montgomery (2008), “She opts not to languish, but to live her own life, a mark of her modernity.”
Valancy may be modern in this, and ambitious about taking control of her life, but in other ways she is far less ambitious than some of Montgomery’s other heroines, such as Anne Shirley and Emily Starr, both of whom are ambitious about their education and professional accomplishments as well as about personal happiness. Valancy is ambitious about finding love—she despairs that “no man has ever desired her” (Chapter 1)—but while she is a reader, she’s never had any professional ambitions. Laura M. Robinson writes that “The only ambition [Valancy] has is tied up in her Blue Castle in Spain, a reference to her constant daydreams of riches and lovers which enable her to tolerate desperate daily conditions in her ugly home with her ugly room and her unloving relatives. The novel is silent, at best, on higher education for women” (“‘A Gift for Friendship’: Revolutionary Friendship in Anne of the Island and The Blue Castle,” in L.M. Montgomery’s Rainbow Valleys: The Ontario Years, 1911-1942, edited by Rita Bode and Lesley D. Clement [2015]).
My friend Naomi and I are hosting a readalong for The Blue Castle this month (see my post from last spring, “An Invitation to Read The Blue Castle, by L.M. Montgomery,” and Naomi’s post from a few weeks ago, “The Blue Castle Readalong: #ReadingValancy”). Please join us, by commenting on her blog and/or mine, by discussing the novel on social media, or by writing your own blog post (please send us the link!).
When I write about Montgomery’s novels, I usually try to illustrate blog posts with photos from trips to Prince Edward Island (or, in the case of Anne of the Island, Nova Scotia), but The Blue Castle is set in Ontario, and I haven’t been to the Muskoka Lakes region that inspired the setting for this novel. I suggested to Naomi that we read the novel in November because of this beautiful passage about November at Mistawis:
November—with uncanny witchery in its changed trees. With murky red sunsets flaming in smoky crimson behind the westering hills. With dear days when the austere woods were beautiful and gracious in a dignified serenity of folded hands and closed eyes—days full of a fine, pale sunshine that sifted through the late, leafless gold of the juniper-trees and glimmered among the grey beeches, lighting up evergreen banks of moss and washing the colonnades of the pines. Days with a high-sprung sky of flawless turquoise. Days when an exquisite melancholy seemed to hang over the landscape and dream about the lake. But days, too, of the wild blackness of great autumn storms, followed by dank, wet, streaming nights when there was witch-laughter in the pines and fitful moans among the mainland trees. What cared they? Old Tom had built his roof well, and his chimney drew.
“Warm fire—books—comfort—safety from storm—our cats on the rug. Moonlight,” said Barney, “would you be any happier now if you had a million dollars?” (Chapter 31)
I don’t have photos of Ontario’s “fine, pale sunshine” or “turquoise skies,” so I’ll include a few photos of Nova Scotia in November instead.
I hadn’t read The Blue Castle since I was about twelve, and I didn’t remember very much about the story. The only thing that really stuck with me over the years was the letter Valancy receives from her doctor, in which he tells her she has a dangerous form of heart disease, and only a year to live. I didn’t remember any details about the terrible way her relatives treat her, or about her romance with Barney Snaith.
On this reading, I was especially interested in the many references to “reality” and “unreality.” Valancy leaves behind that “lifetime of unrealities” to look for “reality.” When Barney accepts her proposal of marriage, however, he says contradictory things. He wants them to be honest with each other: “we are never to pretend anything to each other”; “we’ll never tell a lie to each other about anything—a big lie or a petty lie.” But he also says, “I have things I want to hide”; “You are not to ask me about them.”
I was a little surprised that Valancy accepts these conditions without question (even though she also makes her own condition, that he must never speak of her illness). They begin their marriage promising to be open and honest about everything, except about the things that will always be kept secret. And I was surprised that she doesn’t resent the time he spends shut up in “Bluebeard’s Chamber.” She isn’t even very curious about what he does during those hours. When she thinks of it at all, she speculates that “he must be conducting chemical experiments—or counterfeiting money.” Yet “she did not trouble herself about it,” because “His past and his future concerned her not. Only this rapturous present. Nothing else mattered” (Chapter 29). However, it isn’t just in the past that he locked himself in this room for hours at a time—this is something he’s doing in the present, with no explanation for why he spends all this time away from her. Given that she’s so concerned with “reality,” why doesn’t the truth about what he’s doing matter more?
It was fascinating to learn that Montgomery said she was sorry she’d finished writing The Blue Castle: “It has been for several months a daily escape from a world of intolerable realities,” she wrote in her journal (quoted by E. Holly Pike in “Propriety and the Proprietary: The Commodification of Health and Nature in The Blue Castle,” in L.M. Montgomery’s Rainbow Valleys). She was writing about Valancy finding happiness with Barney at a time when she herself was extremely worried about her husband’s mental illness. Her work on The Blue Castle also helped her postpone her work on the third and last novel in the “Emily” series, as I mentioned when I wrote about Emily’s Quest in the spring.
(A note for those of you who haven’t finished reading The Blue Castle yet—I’m about to talk about the ending, so you might want to stop reading at this point….)
Montgomery escaped her own “intolerable realities” by inventing a happier story, a happier reality, for Valancy. She put off writing a conventional happy ending for Emily, and focused instead on this new novel about a heroine who rejects convention and revels in her discovery of “a world which had nothing in common with the one she had left behind.” I read Jane Urquhart’s biography of Montgomery last spring and I returned to it after I read The Blue Castle, because I remembered her argument about the contrast between Montgomery and Edith Wharton: she writes that “while Wharton would be able to look deeply into the dark heart of North American rural severity as well as into urban privilege in her writing, Lucy Maud Montgomery would never, in her novels, be able to confront head-on the sometimes grim realities of her own existence” (L.M. Montgomery [2009]).
“The absolute freedom of it all was unbelievable,” Valancy thinks of her marriage to Barney. “They could do exactly as they liked” (Chapter 28). It is all a bit unbelievable, in the end, with all the references to “perfect happiness” (Chapters 21, 22, and 27). Valancy is so happy, in fact, that “her happiness terrified her” (Chapter 45).
In Magic Island, Waterston lists several of the books Montgomery read while she was working on The Blue Castle, one of which was Jane Austen’s Emma. It seems to me that there’s an echo of Austen’s language in this last paragraph of The Blue Castle: “She was so happy that her happiness terrified her,” Montgomery says. The last sentence of Emma refers to “the perfect happiness of the union” between the heroine and hero. And Austen’s Persuasion ends with Anne Elliot’s happy marriage and her fears for the future: “the dread of a future war” is “all that could dim her sunshine.” Emma is perfectly happy; Anne is happy and also worried. Valancy, who at the beginning of The Blue Castle learned to conquer her fear, is so happy she’s terrified.
Some of the passages I want to remember:
“Valancy did not persist. Valancy never persisted. She was afraid to.” (Chapter 1)
“Fear is the original sin,” wrote John Foster. “Almost all the evil in the world has its origin in the fact that someone is afraid of something.” (Chapter 5)
“I’ve had nothing but a second-hand existence,” decided Valancy. “All the great emotions of life have passed me by. I’ve never even had a grief. And have I ever really loved anybody?” (Chapter 8)
“After all, Valancy must be both mad and bad.” (The judgement of Olive, the “wonder girl of the whole Stirling clan,” in Chapter 21)
Valancy’s conversation with Uncle Benjamin after she’s announced her marriage (Chapter 27):
“Say ‘damn’ and you’ll feel better,” she suggested.
“I can express my feelings without blasphemy. And I tell you you have covered yourself with eternal disgrace and infamy by marrying that drunkard—”
“You would be more endurable if you got drunk occasionally. Barney is not a drunkard.”
And her exchange with Cousin Sarah, later in that same chapter:
“I’m glad I never had any children,” said Cousin Sarah. “If they don’t break your heart in one way they do it in another.”
“Isn’t it better to have your heart broken than to have it wither up?” queried Valancy. “Before it could be broken it must have felt something splendid. That would be worth the pain.
Barney to Uncle Benjamin (Chapter 28):
“I have made her happy,” he said coolly, “and she was miserable with her friends. So that’s that.”
Uncle Benjamin stared. It had never occurred to him that women had to be, or ought to be, “made happy.”
The passage about November:
“Warm fire—books—comfort—safety from storm—our cats on the rug. Moonlight,” said Barney, “would you be any happier now if you had a million dollars?”
“No, nor half so happy. I’d be bored by conventions and obligations then.” (Chapter 31)
As Barney comes to know Valancy better, he begins to think she’s too good to be true: “Sometimes I feel you’re too nice to be real—that I’m just dreaming you” (Chapter 34). Still, he eventually acknowledges that she has “made me believe again in the reality of friendship and love” (Chapter 42).
Blog posts on The Blue Castle:
Maggie Arnold: “‘Born Again’: Valancy’s Journey from False Religion to True Faith”
Bethie Baxter: “Valancy Stirling’s Inner Life”
Grab the Lapels: “The Blue Castle #Reading Valancy” and “#ReadingValancy discussion post for those who have read The Blue Castle”
My Book Strings: “Like a Warm Hug: The Blue Castle #ReadingValancy”
Covered in Flour: “#ReadingValancy: The Power of Names in The Blue Castle”
Naomi MacKinnon (Consumed By Ink): “5 Reasons Why I Shouldn’t Like The Blue Castle #ReadingValancy”
Miss Bates Reads Romance: “Opening-Line Mini-Review: L. M. Montgomery’s THE BLUE CASTLE”
Rohan Maitzen: “My First Romance?: L.M. Mongomery, The Blue Castle”
Brona’s Books: “The Blue Castle by L.M. Montgomery”
So excited for the readalong! This is one of the few LMMs I’ve not yet read, so I can’t wait. The passage about November is gorgeous – if that’s any indication, I will love this book. My copy just arrived yesterday and I’m hoping to dig in this weekend!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so glad you’re joining us, Jaclyn. Happy reading! I love what my friend Rohan says in her blog post, about the way Montgomery writes about nature: “I also liked the lyrical nature writing in the novel, which is linked in the plot to the books of Valancy’s favorite author … , so that the descriptions, which are usually filtered through Valancy’s emotions, draw all the elements of the novel together. I’ve never been to the Muskoka region of Ontario, but Montgomery made me wistful for it in a dreamy kind of way, as a place I’ve never seen and yet somehow know intimately.”
LikeLike
I was surprised by the same things as you – especially that she wasn’t more curious about what Barney was doing in Bluebeard’s Chamber! But, of course, it all goes toward the mysteries and surprises.
Interesting quote from Urquhart’s book… LMM does tend to write about all the things she wishes for herself. And there’s always a happy ending. Which is one of the things I love about her books. Most of the other books I read are very different that way.
Your photos are beautiful!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess she’s willing to accept a certain amount of mystery — maybe that openness to uncertainty is part of the way she embraces reality. Life is full of uncertainties, and Barney’s secrets are part of that. Glad you enjoyed the photos!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought I had read all LM’s novels, but I missed this one. It’s now at the top of my reading list. Thanks, Sarah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure, Janet. Happy reading! I’ll look forward to hearing what you think.
LikeLike
Dear Sarah,
I wrote a tiny little paean to LMM’s Blue Castle on my blog. I adored the book!
https://missbatesreadsromance.com/2016/01/23/review-l-m-montgomery-the-blue-castle/
(The ensuing comments are good too, as several readers chimed in with more praise.) Lovely post for a wonderful book!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Miss Bates! I love your description of Valancy as a “wild woodland creature.” And you’re absolutely right, this book deserves to be better known. I’d encourage any Anne of Green Gables fan to read more about Valancy (and Emily Starr, too). Thanks very much for reminding me about your post. I’ve added the link above as well.
LikeLike
Aw, thank you, it was tiny, but heartfelt!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved this book. I think I’m due for a reread. I think that Valancy’s lack of curiosity regarding Barney’s “chamber” is, in part, due to the fact that she doesn’t think their marriage has a future. She’s trying to enjoy the present with him, and if he needs to spend a few hours alone in this room each day, she’s not going to fight him on that. Why would she, coming from a background where she’s spent so much time with a domineering family herself? To her it probably doesn’t seem like an unreasonable request, and certainly not one that’s worth a fight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great point about Valancy’s attitude toward the future. I see what you mean about why she wouldn’t insist that he tell her everything. I guess she’s grateful for the marriage and the amount of happiness she’s found already, and she doesn’t want to risk losing what she has. I’m glad Naomi suggested we reread this book. Hope you enjoy revisiting it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly how I feel. And I think she doesn’t want to be as overbearing to him as her family was to her.
Thanks, I’m glad she suggested it too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m totally hooked now, Sarah: can’t wait to read this. As usual I’ll probably not get around to posting about it – although there’s always the chance. The link with Emma is a bonus too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope you enjoy it, Sandra! I totally understand about not having enough time to post about everything. (I did get a few good photos from the road trip to the South Shore that you and I discussed a few weeks ago, but I haven’t had time to do a separate blog post…. Maybe I’ll save them for a future post on Montgomery or Austen.)
LikeLike
I’ll look out for them whenever you get around to posting them, Sarah. I’m sure I’ll enjoy The Blue Castle – hopefully I’ll let you know!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I so love this book and can’t thank you enough for recommending it. I think what most readers love about Valancy is her decision to live authentically and truthfully express herself. It takes courage to say what you actually feel. In fact, my pastor — who has been at the bedside of many sick people — once said that the most common deathbed regret he hears is “I wish I had spent more time with my family” and “I wish I would have just said what I really felt.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mary, I’m so glad to hear you’re happy about discovering this book. I agree, Valancy’s decision to tell the truth and embrace life is courageous and inspiring. That’s a great point about the connection with your pastor’s experience. Valancy does want to live while she can, to look for love and honesty, so as not to regret lost opportunities when she’s dying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for suggesting TBC. I thought I read all of LMM. Will have to check the other books on my NYC shelf. As I posted in Facebook, I read through in 3 days and now I have started a slow read. Wow! What a luxury. The first chapter, which I read last night, has so much in it. LMM tells us so much about what is happening, if we only pay attention. It reminds me of JA’s beginnings. By the middle of the first chapter of Persuasion you know all about Sir Walter, Anne etc.
So what do we know from the first chapter: Valancy is miserable, obviously but why? She says that she didn’t mind being an old maid but what really hurt was that “no one desired her”. She craves love. We also learn that her hero in the Blue Castle have changed and now has “reddish, tawny hair, ….” Are we to look for a man who looks like that? We know she craves beauty. We hear about her reaction to John Foster’s books. “John Foster’s magic was indefinable”
Check the adjectives that LMM uses to describe Valancy’s existence. “ugly sordid room” “hideous” “grotesque” “faded” “discolored”. By the way, what is a “lambrequin”?
We also know about her personality up to this point: “…Valancy did not persist. Vacancy never persisted.” She was “cowed” “subdued” “overridden” and “snubbed”. She was “bored” “…lonely, undesired, ill-favored – the only homely girl in a handsome clan,…” “…life was drab and colorless…”. “Vacancy never said what she thought.”
When I write my travel articles, a friend always says, “more adjectives, please.” Can’t complain about LMM’s lack of adjectives, can we.
On to Chapter 2.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m inspired by your example, Nili, and I’m planning to reread the novel again this month, more slowly this time. I love the comparison with Persuasion. And yes, there’s no shortage of adjectives! The emphasis on colour (or lack of it) is interesting. Those turquoise skies, a symbol of the glorious new life she’s discovered. I looked up lambrequin, and it’s a piece of fabric draped from a window or door or mantel.
LikeLike
Thank you for the lambrequin definition. I am up to chapter 6 now. Chapter 5 was interesting because Valancy is just starting her rebellion even before seeing Dr. Trent. She scares herself as she rebels and is sorry about it because of the consequences but nevertheless, she starts her rebellion. Obviously it is all easier once she has nothing to lose. Can’t wait to read Chapter 6 tomorrow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So interesting to see her persist in her rebellion, especially since we were told in the first chapter that she “never persisted.”
LikeLike
Pingback: 5 Reasons Why I Shouldn’t Like The Blue Castle #ReadingValancy – Consumed by Ink
I’m reading/rereading two chapters each weekday and am thoroughly enjoying the story. It feels like a long time between readings, but I haven’t checked my log yet and, in any case, I followed your instructions and stopped reading when you said you were going to discuss the ending (I might not remember properly – who knows) so I will have to check back to see what you’ve said there…once I’ve read the end. *grins*
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the idea of reading two chapters a day. That’s what Nili, who commented above, is doing as well. That specific goal will help me slow down as I’m rereading this month. Looking forward to hearing what you think when you get to the end!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just can’t keep it to 2 chapters a day, so I read 6-10 today. But as I had to skip a couple of days, I guess I am on track. What did I highlight as I was reading today? (Sarah, the advantage of an e-reader is that I can highlight and then can erase it when done.)
1. As she is going through Lover’s Lane she tries to figure out if she is shocked, but realizes that if she is honest with herself, she is only jealous that she never had experiences.
2. We first see Barney. Yes he looks like her Blue Castle hero. Amazingly, he has lived there for 5 years and this is only the second time she has seen him. The first sighting must have made quite an impression. She says, “Nobody with a smile like that could be bad, no matter what he had done.” How funny is that?
3. Chapter 7 begins her real rebellion. The chopping of the rose bush would make great movie drama. It is funny and sad.
4. Reading the doctor’s letter. On first reading I totally missed the import of the last name.
5. Chapter 8: “Valancy felt a curious freedom”. Since she won’t live to old age, why worry? And now the rebellion has really started. She is mad that she has no past.
6. She then has the horrible night recounting all the sad things that happened to her like the sand pile and the button incident.
7. Then Chapter 10 – The dinner party is a hoot. I love it. She is actually enjoying herself.
Such a dense story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be great to see the rose bush scene! I’m now up to Chapter 17. Loved these lines from the first page of Chapter 16, which I read this afternoon: “She brushed the old years and habits and inhibitions away from her like dead leaves. She would *not* be littered with them.”
LikeLike
Pingback: Valancy Stirling’s Inner Life | Sarah Emsley
Now up to Chapter 26: In chapter 14 Valancy says “It was so easy to defy once you got started. The first step was the only one that really counted.” How true about everything. You can just see her unfold as she falls in love with Barney.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, starting is the hardest part. Amazing to see it all happen so quickly for her, after so many years of waiting to begin.
LikeLike
I love the extra details you & Naomi have given this book thanks to your extra-curricular reading about Montgomery.
I didn’t know anything about LM’s back story & feel rather sad that she had her own hard realities that she was trying to avoid by writing.
Given my love of the Anne books too, I should one day read a bio….which one is the best?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d recommend Mary Henley Rubio’s biography, Lucy Maud Montgomery: The Gift of Wings. I first read it in 2009 and I’ve returned to it many times over the years. Jane Urquhart’s book L.M. Montgomery is much shorter, and also well worth reading. Thanks for reading The Blue Castle with us!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Like a Warm Hug: The Blue Castle #ReadingValancy – My Book Strings
Pingback: “Born again”: Valancy’s Journey from False Religion to True Faith | Sarah Emsley