Tags
beaches, books, Fiction, flowers, Jane of Lantern Hill, L.M. Montgomery, PEI, photography, Prince Edward Island, trees
At first, Jane doesn’t want to leave her mother to travel to Prince Edward Island—even though she dislikes living in Toronto—and she wishes the days wouldn’t fly by so quickly.
(If you missed the first post about L.M. Montgomery’s Jane of Lantern Hill, you can catch up here: “Back in Bonn with Bethie, #ReadingLanternHill.”)
As a very young child, Jane had once asked her mother if there was any way they could stop time, and her mother sighed, saying, “We can never stop time, darling.” Montgomery seems very aware of the passage of time in Jane of Lantern Hill, more than I’ve noticed in her other books. Once Jane gets to PEI, she loves it, and the idyllic life she finds there that first summer seems to go on forever. Then she has to endure nine months before she can return, and she ticks off the months one by one, and feasts on news from the Island.
Blackbush Island, PEI
Ferry to PEI
I love PEI with all my heart, but I have to say that I found some of the descriptions of the Island’s perfections a bit much. In Jane of Lantern Hill, it’s presented as a perfect world. It’s a place of delights, from the delectable food—“a box of doughnuts, three loaves of bread, a round pat of butter with a pattern of clover leaves on it, a jar of cream, a raisin pie and three dried codfish”—to the glorious landscape—“free hills and wide, open fields where you could run wherever you liked, none daring to make you afraid, spruce barrens and shadowy sand-dunes, instead of an iron fence and locked gates”—to the friendly and welcoming people. It’s a place where Jane “could do just as she wanted to without making excuses for anything.” Things happen so easily for her here! Unlike Anne Shirley, who after her arrival in PEI is always getting into “scrapes,” “Jane was very capable and could do almost anything she tried to do. … There was joy in her heart the clock round. Life here was one endless adventure.” Except it doesn’t sound like an adventure, not really, because it’s all so perfect.
My daughter took this photo at Dalvay Lake, PEI a couple of years ago
And it all happens quickly, too. Montgomery sounds to me impatient to make everything work out well for Jane. No one can stop time, but it’s as if she can’t slow down at all to dramatize any complications. Jane and her father set up house at Lantern Hill, and “By the end of a week Jane knew the geography and people of Lantern Hill and Lantern Corners perfectly.” Not only that, but she has a new “bosom friend,” Min. But since Min is only mentioned in passing, in the middle of a long paragraph about how well Jane settles in, we don’t get to see how the girls discover they’re kindred spirits.
While the secondary characters in Montgomery’s Anne or Emily novels are interesting as individuals, I found it hard to keep track of the assortment of characters who surround Jane and her father in their Island home, and I confess I sometimes ended up skimming passages. Jane may be able to “pick out Big Donald Martin’s farm and little Donald Martin’s farm,” but I can’t tell the difference. “Elmer and Min and Polly Garland and Shingle and Jane were all children of the same year and they all liked each other and snubbed each other and offended each other and stood up for each other against the older and younger fry. Jane gave up trying to believe she hadn’t always been friends with them.” I was left wondering why they liked each other, and how they snubbed or offended each other. There’s so much potential here—and I found I wanted more. She’s made friends fast, but they don’t seem like distinct characters to me, just names that appear in lists. “All Jane’s particular friends, old and young, came, even Mary Millicent…. Step-a-yard came and Timothy Salt and Min and Min’s ma and Ding-dong Bell and the Big Donalds and the Little Donalds and people from the Corners that Jane didn’t know knew her.”
I was relieved to learn that when Jane finds her father’s Distinguished Service Medal from the Great War, “breathless with pride over her discovery,” her father is dismissive and tells her to “throw it out.” Conflict at last!
When Jane is back in Toronto, desperate to return home to PEI again, we’re told “The Lantern Hill news was still absorbing,” but as a reader I didn’t feel absorbed in it, I guess because I didn’t feel invested in the characters there. More lists follow, full of news, none of it especially memorable. (I was reminded of the letters Anne Shirley writes in Anne of Windy Poplars, a novel I have always found excruciatingly dull.)
Even though I didn’t feel the same fascination with the news from home, I did feel a deep sympathy for Jane on her return to Lantern Hill, when she realizes “she had never been away at all. She had really been living here all along. It was her spirit’s home.” My heart breaks for her here, and for her creator, and for anyone who feels trapped in a place that isn’t their true home.
As I mentioned in my first post on this novel, Jane’s grandmother reminds me of Lady Catherine de Bourgh. I was glad to find that near the end of the novel, Jane confronts Mrs. Kennedy and demands, “What happened to the letter father wrote to mother long ago, asking her go to back to him, grandmother?” Like Elizabeth Bennet, who refuses to obey Lady Catherine, Jane speaks up for herself and for the truth. She extracts from her grandmother an admission that she burned the letter, and she states clearly that she knows her mother and father love each other still. I was cheering for her and at the same time appreciating the dramatic impact of her grandmother’s decisive reply—“They do not”—but then when the chapter ended abruptly, I was left wondering why Jane’s mother, who was present during this conversation, said nothing at all. Even if Robin isn’t as outspoken as her daughter, it still seems strange to me that she’d be completely silent during this fight between her daughter and her mother.
Maybe Montgomery was dealing with so much conflict in her own life that she didn’t feel able to include more of it in this novel.
I knew, obviously, that in choosing to reread Jane of Lantern Hill as an adult, I might find that I didn’t love it as much as I had when I was young. I wanted to love it, and I did, sometimes, but not all the way through. The story seemed to me sometimes like a draft that would benefit from further revisions. More details about the characters and conflicts between them, more dialogue in key scenes of confrontation, and a little less perfection in the descriptions of PEI.
In the end, Toronto is shown as a place of possibility, not just misery, as Jane envisions a happy life with her reunited parents in the “little stone house in Lakeside Gardens,” during the winter, and then summers at Lantern Hill in PEI. Toronto is a more complex place than it seemed in the first pages of the novel; I guess I wish PEI could be shown as a similarly complex place, rather than just as a perfect heaven.
(And yes, I recognize that I’m showing only idyllic aspects of the Island in these photos…. They’re all holiday photos, taken over the last few years, all of them before the Island was damaged by Hurricane Fiona last fall.)
My sister Bethie and I watched the 1989 Lantern Hill movie earlier this week, and we agreed that in this adaptation there’s a little too much of Wuthering Heights and Northanger Abbey, and not nearly enough PEI. There isn’t even a speck of red dirt on those country roads, or on the north shore cliffs, either.
I’d love to hear what you think of the Island and its inhabitants, and the happy ending Montgomery bestows on Jane and her parents, and on Jody, too. And/or any other aspect of the novel (or the movie) that you’d like to discuss.
If you enjoyed this post, I hope you’ll consider recommending it to a friend. I’m always interested to read your comments and messages. If you’d like to subscribe and receive future posts by email, you can sign up on my website, www.sarahemsley.com. Thanks for reading!
Updated to add a link to Rebecca Foster’s blog post “Jane of Lantern Hill by L.M. Montgomery (1937) #ReadingLanternHill”: she writes that “It’s full of the magic of childhood. What struck me most, and will stick with me, is the exploration of how the feeling of being at home (not just having a house to live in) is essential to happiness.”
Although I was happy to have a reason to finally read my childhood copy of Jane of Lantern Hill (thank you, Sarah and Naomi!), I must say, I was terribly disappointed by it. I, too, wanted to love it, but I found little to really admire about it. I agree, it reads like something Montgomery felt obliged to “dash off.”
That said, the oppressiveness of Grandmother’s house is palpable. It’s such a relief when Jane meets Jody, and of course, Jane’s empathy and desire to help are very admirable. I was struck by Montgomery’s repeated pronouncements on childhood, particularly the relative amount of happiness or anguish of children (e.g., upon first meeting Jody, Jane “knew quite well that it wasn’t right that anybody so young should have such sad eyes”; the declaration that “After all, it does not take much to make a child happy”; and “no child should ever have to suffer” the agony Jane experiences when Grandmother makes Jane feel that she must choose between her mother and her father).
I did mark numerous little bright spots where the writing sounded more like my beloved Anne of Green Gables: “The mornings at Lantern Hill seemed different than the mornings anywhere else…more morningish.”; “‘As soon as you hang a picture on a wall,’ said dad, ‘the wall becomes your friend. A blank wall is hostile.'”; Jane saying, “I made a plum pudding one day last week. It would have been very successful if it had succeeded.”–to list just a few.
It’s always hard to read a book by a beloved author that does not meet one’s expectations. Still, I enjoyed spending time with Jane and revisiting both Toronto and PEI through her eyes. Thanks again for creating the opportunity to do so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Because of its “palpable oppressiveness”, I might have enjoyed the parts of the book set in TO more than the ones in PEI. Even her dad seemed a little too sweet. I loved her relationship with the house, though. I can completely relate to that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, Naomi. I agree, reading about Toronto was much more interesting. I wish there had been even a little bit more conflict and a little less sweetness in the PEI scenes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for highlighting these wonderful quotations, Marianne. Lovely comparisons with Anne of Green Gables. There’s so much potential in this story, and I’m sad that it wasn’t fully realized. It does seem as if LMM was rushing. And it’s understandable, given the immense pressure she was dealing with. But it’s hard not to wish for the richness of the early Anne books.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for this lovely post, Sarah!
It sounds to me like Jane of Lantern Hill and Anne of Windy Poplars mushed together would be the perfect book. In Jane, we get too much of Jane and too little about the secondary characters, so that they blur. In Windy Poplars, it seems like more of a series of vignettes or short stories about all the interesting, quirky characters of a small town – almost Leacockian (is that a word?) – with Anne just there to string them all together.
But what I think is really missing from both novels, and that just putting the two books together wouldn’t solve, is Anne’s/Jane’s interaction with the secondary characters. There’s no Diana, no Gilbert (early days Gilbert, not the Gil of the later novels who is more cardboard than my cereal box), no Mrs. Lynde, no Paul, no Mr. J.A. Harrison. Only with the next-door little Elizabeth, as I remember, did Anne develop any sort of ongoing, changing, living relationship in Windy Poplars. And I don’t think there are any in Lantern Hill, not even the cat.
I wonder why. Was Montgomery just dashing novels off in later years; or did she not have a good enough editor? Or is there a more complex reason: that as we age, we find it harder to make bosom friends, and even the memory of those relationships fades?
I hope not – or if so, that I can consciously fight against it (…maybe by going dancing with new friends?)!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating questions—thanks, Kathy. I can kind of picture Jane of LH mushed together with Windy Poplars, and I don’t think I’d like it until Anne of Green Gables was mushed in as well. This story needs more anodyne liniment and less vanilla. And I agree, a good editor would help. Oh, it makes me sad to think it might be true that friendship becomes more difficult as we age. Yes, absolutely, let’s go dancing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that everything seems *too* perfect for Jane on the Island, which did bother me a bit. But I hadn’t had time to think it through until now. I wonder if the lack of conflict for Jane on the island is because the main conflict in the book is between her parents and the secrets surrounding their relationship. It’s almost as though the real story is their love story and Jane is just the catalyst to get them back together. Although Jane gets along very well during her time on the island, she’s also spending a lot of time thinking about what happened between her parents and learning the truth, and I think that’s what keeps us reading. Not so much Jane’s story.
The other thought I had was the timing of the novel – it’s one of Maud’s last books (as is Anne of Windy Poplars and Anne of Ingleside) – written at a miserable time in Maud’s life. Maybe her heart just wasn’t in it anymore. Or maybe, when it was, it just wanted to drone on about PEI and its homey inhabitants.
When I was looking at LMM’s bibliography, I noticed that The Story Girl books were written in 1911 and 1913 and the Pat books in 1933 and 1935. If we read them now, I wonder what kinds of differences we’d find?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder what the novel would look like if it were told from the perspective of the parents—or the grandmother. Or Jody. Interesting to consider. The sadness of LMM’s later years must have affected pretty much everything. It breaks my heart to think of what she was going through in that period, while still writing these novels.
I had forgotten the dates of those books—or rather, I wasn’t paying attention to such things when I first read them. Maybe we should read The Story Girl and The Golden Road in our next readalong, and then compare with the two Pat books? I’m up for any of those, or Kilmeny. What do you think? Maybe in the fall?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been looking for a reason to finally read The Story Girl, which I bought at LMM’s birthplace a few years ago. Pat of Silver Bush is one I’ve owned since childhood. I’m quite certain I read it back then, but I would certainly read it again so that I could discuss it with you all!
LikeLike
Great to hear! I thought I had a copy of The Story Girl, but I don’t. I must have read a library copy. I do have The Golden Road.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would love to do a comparison! Fall sounds good to me!
LikeLike
Wonderful! Maybe October and November, since there are two books this time? What about The Story Girl books in the fall, and the Pat books the next time we decide to do this?
LikeLike
I recently read Jane of Lantern Hill for the first time since childhood, reading aloud to my girls. I remember thinking about the idea of a life transformed, particularly a hard or a sad one. The notion that somehow life will suddenly improve or change in ways you couldn’t have imagine, like Jane discovering PEI and her father. In fact, I remember assuring my five year old at the beginning that “things get better” for Jane. I’m sure that part of all that PEI perfection is to show a radical comparison to her life before. A bit of a fantasy quality. Maybe people – readers, authors (?) are drawn to a theme like this because it offers hope. But I very much agree with you that I would love life on PEI to be more complex and have more depth.
LikeLike
Good point, Catherine. I’m sure you’re right that the theme of transformation appeals to many. The idea that no matter how bad life is at the start of the novel, it’s possible to escape into a new chapter. I suppose it’s a variation on what happens in Anne of Green Gables, as Anne moves from a challenging life in Nova Scotia to a rich and fulfilling life in PEI. As Montgomery’s own life became more difficult, I expect it must have been harder to hold onto that hope. Thanks so much for joining us to talk about Jane of LH.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: “She is my daughter … no outsider shall ever come between us again” #ReadingLanternHill | Sarah Emsley
The transformation of downtrodden Toronto Victoria Jane, successful at nothing, no friends except a maid, unable to even relate to a cousin she frequently visits, into a Renaissance woman who beguiles every Islander she meets, is instantly an expert cook, gardener and mender… there is nothing she cannot do, including curing psychological ailments, a local celebrity up until the jump-the-shark point of lion taming… all down to finding the love of her adorable father: intelligent, whimsical, at ease, and most of all, like her: Jane’s love language is acts of love and kindness, and their reciprocal demonstrations remind me of the very best moments of child raising.
To me, this book was about Andrew Stuart. If I had been deprived of my father, dissatisfied with the time I was able to spend with him, never being able to establish easy family intimacy with him or my stepmother, and then been disappointed, bitterly, in my marriage, with some self-recrimination in the mix, too, I might have written this book about an ideal man, a father, and a daughter for whom he provides the moon and everything beneath it. Just as Jane can conjure up an imaginary garden in a bleak back yard to comfort Jody, Lucy Maud Montgomery conjured up a father fairy tale to comfort herself.
This theory is probably flimsy and would benefit from a comparison with Montgomery’s other male lead characters. Most of my reading there is going back a long time. I do remember feeling that Gilbert Blythe was more of a prop than a fully sketched person in the Anne books.
The movie should have the Toronto scenes in black and white, and the Island scenes in luminous colour. Grandmother and all the relatives don’t seem to have grasped that a child is not a mini-adult, and Mother is such lukewarm milquetoast that she still doesn’t deserve the perfect man, even though she gets him in the end, but it’s Jane’s happiness we are clamoring for here. Robin’s love language seems to be limited to protestations of love.
I think this book is a wonderful fantasy retribution on how life turned out for Montgomery. I don’t blame her a bit for writing it that way, and it makes me think pleasantly about my fantasy reworkings too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I appreciate your insight into Jane’s dramatic transformation, and LMM’s creation of the ideal father. I remember feeling disappointed that Gilbert pretty much disappears from Anne of Windy Poplars, just at the moment at which Anne might be expected to celebrate the happiness of their engagement. I’ll be interested to hear what you think of the hero of The Blue Castle, in comparison with Jane’s father. I guess it isn’t surprising that, given various disappointments in her personal life, Montgomery was writing about a kind of escape to a more perfect world.
LikeLike
Sarah, “nametraditions” is me, Linda Lefler. For some reason WordPress identifies me by the username of a now-deleted blog I used to have. Must see how to fix that!
LikeLike
Thanks so much for joining us, Linda!
LikeLike
Pingback: #ReadingLanternHill: My thoughts on Jane of Lantern Hill, anthropomorphism, and Squishmallows – Consumed by Ink